Forced Sterilization

Markeisha A. K nont History of Medicine in the U. S. Class 421 Forced Sterilization throughout history there have al elbow rooms been circumstances where the govern custodyt has inf in allible citizens to undergo almost sort of medical mapping. correct though some of these procedures were commonplace in the past, they are now considered ethically wrong. Forced sterilisation is an example of this, because it denies a wo homophile of the ability to bare children, and denies a man the ability to inseminate.Sterilization is defined as the act of do an organism double-dyed(a) or infertile (unable to reproduce). When most stack hear the words labored sterilisation the first thing that often comes to mind are the Nazis. In the 1930s the Nazis introduced a massive, compulsory sterilization of a large instalment of the German population (Rosenberg, Jennifer). The government believed that the Germans with the best genes had been killed off in the irregular World War, while those w ith the worse genes stayed behind and didnt fight, and were then release to procreate much(prenominal) of their bad genes.Believing that that the preservation of the optimal German genes were more important that an individuals beneficials, the government had the authority to do whatsoever it took to preserve these optimal genes. However, Germany was not the first country to perform hale sterilization (Rosenberg, Jennifer). Even though in the United States we tend to degenerate this as something that did not happen, it did. It is divorce of our past, and will everlastingly be part of American history.During the 1900s the United States had a eugenics program in which the propose was to attempt to perfect the gene pool, with the idea that if societys degenerates, resembling criminals and the mentally ill were barred from having children then societys problems would go (Webster University). American biologists like Charles B. Davenport and Harry H. Laughlin supported the ide a of keeping the Anglo-American ply pure. Their belief was that most ailments and social problems were hereditary, like poverty and criminality (Piotrowski, Crista). Therefore, heap with good enes should be encour advanced to pass on their genes by having more children, while those with bad genes should be barred from reproducing. There were many types of people who fell under the label of being genetically inferior. This included epileptics, manic-depressives, prostitutes, alcoholics, the homeless, and criminals. pack who fell under any one of these categories or who caught the negative financial aid of authorities were deemed feeble-minded by the court, and were legally oblige to undergo sterilization (Piotrowski, Crista). some(prenominal) other countries used forced sterilization as well, though for distinguishable reasons.Peru, for example, was faced with a large population jump and not abounding resources to support all the people. So they came up with a solution making a target number of the amount of people to e sterilised every year, which would effectively lower the population if the plan worked. n 1996, it was 100,000. It was not met that year, but the target for the next year was increased to 130,000 and in that year, the quota was met. Even though sterilization can be performed on both men and women, it is mostly women who are dupes of forced sterilization since they are the one who rattling have babies (Webster University).About 40 days ago in northward Carolina, it wasnt uncommon that a single mother on welfare, or a mental patient in a hospital to be forcibly and unknowingly sterilised against their will. Of course at the time, over half of all the states in the U. S. had eugenics laws well into the 1970s (Rose, Julie). North Carolina is currently thinking of compensating the victims of forced sterilization, most of whom were poor and uneducated, blacks and whites alike. One woman, Elaine Riddick, now 57, was sterilized at age fourteen because the state deemed her promiscuous and a trouble retracer.Riddick was actually a young girl living in poverty and hunger, and was a victim of rape. While giving birth through C-section to her only son, the cross way of life of said rape, the doctors also sterilized her. There was consent form on which Riddicks illiterate grandmother signed the go-ahead for the procedure with an X. Whats worse is that Riddick didnt find about her being unimpregnated until she was married, 19, and trying to have more children. Riddick is just one of the many communion the same story. Nearly 7,600 men and women as young as 10 have been sterilized in North Carolina.Social workers would coerce women to have the appendage under threat of losing their public assistance, because sterilization was viewed as a way to cut spending on public welfare (Julie Rose). Forced sterilization is a procedure that violates several medical ethics, which is defined as a system of moral principles that apply valu es and judgments to the practice ofmedicine (Wikipedia). This procedure violates three medical ethics autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Every patient is given the right to choose or refuse treatment the right of autonomy.However, forced sterilization doesnt give the patient the chance or ability to make the decision themselves, because the government chooses for them. Beneficence explains that a doctor must always act on a treatment or procedure that is in the best interest of the patient. Sterilization wasnt in any way in the best interest of the patients it was performed on. It was only in the best, selfish, interests of the government who cherished to keep the Anglo-American race pure and eradicate social problems. Forced sterilization also violates non-maleficence, which simply translates to three words Do No Harm.Many of the patients that were sterilized underwent the procedure without their own knowledge, not knowing of their barren status until years after when the y began to question their failed attempts at having children. I am completely against this excogitation of the government forcing its citizens to do a medical procedure against their will, or performing it while the patient is unaware of it is beyond inconsiderate. Its cruel, and plainly said, its downright shady. Works Cited Medical Ethics. Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Dec. 2010. Web. 22 Nov. 011. . Piotrowski, Crista. Dark Chapter of American History U. S. Court Battle Over Forced Sterilization. Home parking area Dreams. Common Dreams, 21 July 2000. Web. 22 Nov. 2011. . Rosenberg, Jennifer. Sterilization. 20th Century History. About. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. . Rosenberg, Julie. North Carolina Considers Compensating Forced Sterilization Victims NPR. NPR National Public Radio News & Analysis, World, US, medication & Arts NPR. 22 June 2011. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. . Women and Global Human Rights. Webster University. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. .