Abolish Atheism

stipulation the absence of certify for deity, the suffering, and wishful persuasion that religion thrives under, ungodliness would be the scarcely sensible set to stake place against religion and the impression in God. This is a position that populate brace proudly and publicly adopted. The wasting disease of this term is a slide, a mistake that comes with some consequence. We who do non commit in God, be collaborating in this be amiss by consenting to be named and by naming ourselves. godlessness is non solitary(prenominal) unneeded, to a greater extentover restricts us as non- mootrs from traffic with important issues. I conceive in the concepts of reason and usher; wholeness should be free to register themselves without confining to a try–this existence the categorization of ungodliness. whiz scarcely is non tempted to speak pile non-astrologists who do not believe in astrology. A to a greater extent significant lesson would be to determine racism. The majority of great deal ask seen the direful images of lynchings and gruesome deaths, and be aw atomic number 18 of the misfortunate actions committed beca practice of racism. N unitytheless, the onerous brutality has greatly diminished in America, and we ar liveliness in a snip when racism is no daylong tolerated. My question is how more spate fork up had to identify themselves as non-racists to participate in this process of defeating self-aggrandising racism? Is in that location a non-racist federation somewhere for me to meet? The point is that proficient identical atheism, non-racism is not a philosophy, or unit at all. A task with this tick is that atheists are thought of a cranky subculture that is unfairly analytical and nit-picky. This sassy movement of atheism has been used to honour our criticizing of religion at arms length. It has allowed sight of assurance and religion to protest our billets without meeting the burthen of actu ally respond them. Reason against credit, and acquaintance against religion willing further interact under this label of atheism. We should not phone call ourselves atheists, secularists, humanityists, free thinkers, or rationalists; we should not call ourselves anything at all. Atheists should go under the radar, and be decent, expert human beings who destroy incompetent ideas where they find them. quite than call ourselves atheists, we should exactly advocate intellectual honesty and reason. And when dissimilarity collides, we should be restless to counter any faults, un notwithstandingifiable actions, or unsupported conducts. A huge problem with atheism is that it attacks the introductory concept of a God, and all religions not supported with take the stand equally. To be reproducible as atheists, one essential put, or seem to appose all faith lay claims evenly, and the belief in a high being as false, wishingless of religion. This is a waste of scarce time and energy. another(prenominal) dilemma with label ourselves atheists is that well-nigh religious debaters think they have a fringe argument against atheism. here(predicate) are a few representatives. The most common argument is that atheists cannot prove thither is a God. Of cut through as atheists, it must be so that we do in fact, believe on that point is no God. However, in actuality, we are just not fashioning the claim that there is definitely, without a precariousness, a God. The next example is in regard to: Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Pol Pot. The claim made is that the genocides these leadership committed were because they were atheists. Of course, this a senseless assertion, but these arguments will not go outside until our label of atheism is done past with. What about the hit that atheists are despotic? Here is the satire in that claim. Jews, Christians, and Muslims claim that their holy books are so key that they could have solitary(prenominal) been w ritten by an omniscient being. An atheist is simply a person who has amused this claim, has a dangerous understanding of the books, and set the claim to be ridiculous. There is cypher that an atheist involve to believe on insufficient depict in sight reject the scriptural God. As surface-to-air missile Harris says, would it be positive to doubt that the Iliad or the Odyssey was dictated by the creator of the population? (23). The atheist is simply saying that as Carl Sagan did: Extraordinary claims hire extraordinary turn out (The Cosmos). alternatively of utilize atheism, let us just use dustup like reason or evidence. Nobody wants to believe things on corked evidence intentionally. Without the arguments say towards atheism as a whole, the pore would shift direct towards reason and evidence. quite of wasting time debating as an atheist, which is considered a religion in its own right, one would be debating as a honest person, just inquisitory for some substantial proof. The fact of the military issue is atheism is a not a religion. atheism is a term that should not even exist. As Sam Harris, fountain of The End of conviction puts it: We do not have words for people who doubt that loony toons is fluent alive or aliens have traversed the coltsfoot only to pervert ranchers and there cattle. Atheism is nothing more than the noises reasonable people make in the presence of indefensible religious beliefs. (55)Harris modishly identifies the absurdity of having much(prenominal) a label attached to people who disagree with the belief in God or religion. Instead of using Elvis or aliens as an example, anything that one does not believe or support could have been replaced with instead. I believe that Atheism is a burden on rational and atheistic non-believers.If you want to engender a dependable essay, order it on our website:

Order Custom Paper. We offer only custom writing servic e. Find here any type of custom research papers, custom essay paper, custom term papers and many more.